thread

What just happened..lost cred points ?

User Tag List

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6
Results 51 to 60 of 60
  1. VERIFIED TG STAFF Credibility: 4,000
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    595
    Thanks (Received)
    815
    Likes (Received)
    1174
    Blog Entries
    60
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: twingalaxies View Channel: twingalaxieslive
    Mentioned
    153 Post(s)
    Tagged
    32 Thread(s)
    Follows
    33529
    Following
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by lexmark View Post
    I just voted NO on this submission....

    http://www.twingalaxies.com/showthre...0-Jared-Oswald

    The NO vote was due to a typo.

    5 seconds later I notice in the shout box that the submission was ACCEPTED ??

    What's going on ?
    This matter has been reviewed and corrected by ADMIN.

    CR will automatically be adjusted accordingly.

    Remember, all submissions are constantly justifying their rightful place in the database and all CR is calculated continuously. When adjustments are made, everything is affected retroactively. This assures continued database integrity. The only TGSAP scores that are truly "safe" are the ones that always maintain the evidence needed to withstand scrutiny and review.

    Thank you for your patience.
    Thanks nads, stella_blue, lexmark, HugDD thanked this post
    Likes nads, RaGe, stella_blue, lexmark, HugDD liked this post
  2. VERIFIED Veteran Member Credibility: 35,000
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,885
    Thanks (Received)
    1984
    Likes (Received)
    2280
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: stella_blue
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Follows
    29
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TWIN GALAXIES View Post
    This matter has been reviewed and corrected by ADMIN.

    CR will automatically be adjusted accordingly.

    Remember, all submissions are constantly justifying their rightful place in the database and all CR is calculated continuously. When adjustments are made, everything is affected retroactively. This assures continued database integrity. The only TGSAP scores that are truly "safe" are the ones that always maintain the evidence needed to withstand scrutiny and review.

    Thank you for your patience.

    Have the CR adjustments been completed?

    If so, I have a number of unusual CR changes (both gains and losses) to report.

    My credibility rating reconciles perfectly, but many others do not. The results cannot be explained by the overturned adjudication outcome of a single submission. I suspect a number of retro adjustments have been applied, which may involve one or more of the following:

    • The rounding method of the 5% CR penalty calculation
    • The effective date of the 5% CR penalty calculation
    • Additional adjudication results that have been reversed, but not reported in the shoutbox
    • Multiple user accounts detected and merged
    • Correction of a previously unrecognized error
    • Some other unresolved processing error

    In any event, quite a few things simply don't add up.

    If necessary, I can provide documentation of the various CR anomalies.

    Thanks HugDD thanked this post
    Likes HugDD liked this post
  3. VERIFIED TG Head Custodian Credibility: 1,000
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,195
    Thanks (Received)
    914
    Likes (Received)
    1533
    Blog Entries
    30
    Mentioned
    233 Post(s)
    Tagged
    58 Thread(s)
    Follows
    33533
    Following
    99
    Quote Originally Posted by stella_blue View Post

    Have the CR adjustments been completed?

    If so, I have a number of unusual CR changes (both gains and losses) to report.

    My credibility rating reconciles perfectly, but many others do not. The results cannot be explained by the overturned adjudication outcome of a single submission. I suspect a number of retro adjustments have been applied, which may involve one or more of the following:

    • The rounding method of the 5% CR penalty calculation
    • The effective date of the 5% CR penalty calculation
    • Additional adjudication results that have been reversed, but not reported in the shoutbox
    • Multiple user accounts detected and merged
    • Correction of a previously unrecognized error
    • Some other unresolved processing error

    In any event, quite a few things simply don't add up.

    If necessary, I can provide documentation of the various CR anomalies.

    The way the system works, it is not really possible for one member's CR rating to reconcile perfectly and others not. They are either all correct or all incorrect. This is because they are actively calculated and all interconnected.

    Please feel free to provide any information you have so that we can investigate if there are any issues.
    Jace Hall
    Head Custodian and Caretaker
    www.TwinGalaxies.com
    Thanks stella_blue thanked this post
    Likes HugDD liked this post
  4. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 23,017
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,575
    Thanks (Received)
    477
    Likes (Received)
    928
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    47 Thread(s)
    Follows
    22
    Following
    7
    Thanks everyone. I got my cred back.

    Nads...I'm sorry that you had to lose so much cred!

    That amount of loss is always a bitter pill to swallow.

    john

    .
  5. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 5,009
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,602
    Thanks (Received)
    706
    Likes (Received)
    1070
    Blog Entries
    22
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    63 Thread(s)
    Follows
    35
    Following
    15
    *Fixed thank you* @Jace Hall Could I have my credibility recovered for this submission. I voted reject and it should have been rejected due to a typo aswell http://www.twingalaxies.com/showthre...l-Deanda/page2
    Last edited by CWK; 02-01-2017 at 06:22 AM.
  6. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 31,069


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,892
    Thanks (Received)
    2507
    Likes (Received)
    2712
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    87 Thread(s)
    Follows
    65
    Following
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by lexmark View Post
    Thanks everyone. I got my cred back.

    Nads...I'm sorry that you had to lose so much cred!

    That amount of loss is always a bitter pill to swallow.

    john

    .
    Actually it hasn't really bothered much this time, just gotta get back on the horse and learn to check everything!
    Last edited by nads; 02-01-2017 at 02:59 AM.
    Likes HugDD liked this post
  7. VERIFIED TG STAFF Credibility: 4,000
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    595
    Thanks (Received)
    815
    Likes (Received)
    1174
    Blog Entries
    60
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: twingalaxies View Channel: twingalaxieslive
    Mentioned
    153 Post(s)
    Tagged
    32 Thread(s)
    Follows
    33529
    Following
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by CWK View Post
    @Jace Hall Could I have my credibility recovered for this submission. I voted reject and it should have been rejected due to a typo aswell http://www.twingalaxies.com/showthre...l-Deanda/page2
    This matter has been reviewed and corrected by ADMIN.


    CR will automatically be adjusted accordingly.


    Remember, all submissions are constantly justifying their rightful place in the database and all CR is calculated continuously. When adjustments are made, everything is affected retroactively. This assures continued database integrity. As mentioned above, the only TGSAP scores that are truly "safe" are the ones that always maintain the evidence needed to withstand scrutiny and review - and in addition to voters specifically identifying a listed score detail discrepancy, this particular submission was also found to be missing its original evidence upon review.


    Thank you for your patience.
    Thanks bensweeneyonbass, CWK thanked this post
  8. VERIFIED Veteran Member Credibility: 35,000
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,885
    Thanks (Received)
    1984
    Likes (Received)
    2280
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: stella_blue
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Follows
    29
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jace Hall View Post
    The way the system works, it is not really possible for one member's CR rating to reconcile perfectly and others not. They are either all correct or all incorrect. This is because they are actively calculated and all interconnected.

    Please feel free to provide any information you have so that we can investigate if there are any issues.

    The following information covers a 26 hour period of adjudication activity.

    All times are reported as Eastern Standard Time (EST).

    Start Date & Time

    Monday, 01-30-17 at 07:00 AM

    End Date & Time

    Tuesday, 01-31-17 at 09:00 AM

    Closed Submissions

    A total of 16 submissions completed (14 accepted, 2 rejected):

    January 30th

    11:56 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    12:11 PM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    01:32 PM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    02:12 PM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    02:31 PM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    04:12 PM - Link to Submission - Rejected
    06:40 PM - Link to Submission - Accepted

    January 31st

    12:22 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    12:22 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    01:11 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    01:32 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    02:30 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    02:55 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    03:13 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    04:31 AM - Link to Submission - Accepted
    05:34 AM - Link to Submission - Rejected (reversed; previously accepted)

    Credibility Summary

    A total of 115 TG members experienced a credibility gain or loss. Given the submission activity that took place (15 "typical" adjudications and 1 outcome reversal), 85 of those CR data shifts are unusual. The results have convinced me of at least 2 things:

    • Although CR appears to be an integer when displayed, it must be stored internally as a different data type (single or double precision floating point number)
    • The ending CR values include a number of cumulative adjustments and/or corrections, involving additional submission activity that occurred days/weeks/months ago

    I will post the CR data summary (split into 6 parts) in separate replies.

    Thanks HugDD thanked this post
    Likes HugDD liked this post
  9. VERIFIED Veteran Member Credibility: 35,000
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,885
    Thanks (Received)
    1984
    Likes (Received)
    2280
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: stella_blue
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Follows
    29
    Following
    0

    Credibility Summary (continued)

    I have highlighted the "questionable" numbers (in the "CR Gain or Loss" column) that deserve a closer look. I'm NOT claiming that the results are incorrect; I'm simply stating that a lot more is going on here than a single day's worth of activity.

    Part 1 of 6:

    Name:  CR Review 2017-01-31 (Part 1).jpg
Views: 34
Size:  85.9 KB


    Part 2 of 6:

    Name:  CR Review 2017-01-31 (Part 2).jpg
Views: 32
Size:  82.3 KB


    Part 3 of 6:

    Name:  CR Review 2017-01-31 (Part 3).jpg
Views: 31
Size:  82.6 KB

    Thanks HugDD thanked this post
    Likes HugDD liked this post
  10. VERIFIED Veteran Member Credibility: 35,000
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,885
    Thanks (Received)
    1984
    Likes (Received)
    2280
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: stella_blue
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Follows
    29
    Following
    0

    Credibility Summary (continued)

    Part 4 of 6:

    Name:  CR Review 2017-01-31 (Part 4).jpg
Views: 35
Size:  79.5 KB


    Part 5 of 6:

    Name:  CR Review 2017-01-31 (Part 5).jpg
Views: 33
Size:  77.2 KB


    Part 6 of 6:

    Name:  CR Review 2017-01-31 (Part 6).jpg
Views: 31
Size:  62.2 KB

    Thanks HugDD thanked this post
    Likes HugDD liked this post
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6
Join us