thread

Record Count Incorrect In User Profile

User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29
  1. VERIFIED CUSTODIAN Credibility: 10,500
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    555
    Thanks (Received)
    468
    Likes (Received)
    305
    Blog Entries
    26
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: 123
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Tagged
    38 Thread(s)
    Follows
    35
    Following
    29
    Hi jpittman

    This is corrected now . Please check and confirm

    Regards
    Twingalaxies Staff

    Quote Originally Posted by jpittman View Post
    Same problem here. I have four total entries in the scoreboard, two of them being 1st place scores. And yet my profile reports "World Records (1), Other Records (1)". This is obviously screwed up when you view it against your own profile's Rankings tab:

    Attachment 28064
    @admin staff - Just in case you aren't already aware of this issue, consider yourselves notified.
  2. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 4,357
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    914
    Thanks (Received)
    1026
    Likes (Received)
    765
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Follows
    10
    Following
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by admin staff View Post
    This is corrected now . Please check and confirm
    Twingalaxies Staff
    Now the total of records is correct (4), but the distribution remains strange—1 "World Record" score, and 3 "Other Records" scores. How is that possible when I have 2 first place scores? That always equated to 2 "World Record" entries before this started happening. Why is it different now?
    Name:  tmp1.jpg
Views: 61
Size:  53.7 KB

    Jamey Pittman
    Perfect Pac-Man - 3,333,360 (Twin Galaxies, MARP)
    The Pac-Man Dossier
  3. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 31,087


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,895
    Thanks (Received)
    2509
    Likes (Received)
    2715
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    87 Thread(s)
    Follows
    66
    Following
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by jpittman View Post
    Now the total of records is correct (4), but the distribution remains strange—1 "World Record" score, and 3 "Other Records" scores. How is that possible when I have 2 first place scores? That always equated to 2 "World Record" entries before this started happening. Why is it different now?
    The reason is your PAC-MAN high score challenge track was a user created track.
    At This stage it is not a PREMIUM track and therefore classed as a OTHER record.

    My record count is now correct, my user created tracks have been added to other.

    Good to go!
  4. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 10,774
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,275
    Thanks (Received)
    844
    Likes (Received)
    1840
    Blog Entries
    16
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: magrinder
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    69 Thread(s)
    Follows
    38
    Following
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by jpittman View Post
    Now the total of records is correct (4), but the distribution remains strange—1 "World Record" score, and 3 "Other Records" scores. How is that possible when I have 2 first place scores? That always equated to 2 "World Record" entries before this started happening. Why is it different now?
    The high score challenge isn't a premium track. All non premium tracks are now being listed as "other records."

    @Jace Hall @SincerelyFranny

    1. What is the current premium track request process? How does a user request that an "other" track be moved to a premium track?
    2. Are you able to confirm that all non premium tracks moving forward will be considered as other?

    Likes nads liked this post
  5. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 4,357
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    914
    Thanks (Received)
    1026
    Likes (Received)
    765
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Follows
    10
    Following
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by nads View Post
    The reason is your PAC-MAN high score challenge track was a user created track.
    At This stage it is not a PREMIUM track and therefore classed as a OTHER record.
    So any 1st place score that isn't a legacy track gets lumped in with non-1st place scores now?! Yeesh. Okay, I understand; I'm not happy TG has done this, mind you, but I now comprehend why my score distribution has changed from 2:2 to 1:3.

    Jamey Pittman
    Perfect Pac-Man - 3,333,360 (Twin Galaxies, MARP)
    The Pac-Man Dossier
    Likes nads, Conjured Entertainment liked this post
  6. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 31,087


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,895
    Thanks (Received)
    2509
    Likes (Received)
    2715
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    87 Thread(s)
    Follows
    66
    Following
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by Max View Post
    The high score challenge isn't a premium track. All non premium tracks are now being listed as "other records."

    @Jace Hall @SincerelyFranny

    1. What is the current premium track request process? How does a user request that an "other" track be moved to a premium track?
    2. Are you able to confirm that all non premium tracks moving forward will be considered as other?
    You can PM @TWIN GALAXIES to make a case for it to be upgraded or if it get 10 scores on it then it will automatically become premium
  7. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 10,774
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,275
    Thanks (Received)
    844
    Likes (Received)
    1840
    Blog Entries
    16
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: magrinder
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    69 Thread(s)
    Follows
    38
    Following
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by nads View Post
    You can PM @TWIN GALAXIES to make a case for it to be upgraded or if it get 10 scores on it then it will automatically become premium
    Thanks!

    Still pending for TG:

    Are you able to confirm that all non premium tracks moving forward will be considered as other?

  8. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 31,087


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,895
    Thanks (Received)
    2509
    Likes (Received)
    2715
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    87 Thread(s)
    Follows
    66
    Following
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by Max View Post
    Thanks!

    Still pending for TG:

    Are you able to confirm that all non premium tracks moving forward will be considered as other?
    Thats how I see it
  9. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 3,577
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Roscoe TX, USA
    Posts
    2,079
    Thanks (Received)
    215
    Likes (Received)
    466
    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    79 Thread(s)
    Follows
    61
    Following
    37
    my record count dropped also. whats going on?
    The Circle Leader
    King of Genesis
    Son of GinaLee
  10. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 4,159
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    868
    Thanks (Received)
    957
    Likes (Received)
    1030
    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    10 Thread(s)
    Follows
    21
    Following
    14
    I like the idea of there being a distinction between premium and standard tracks...where I'm on the fence is having first-place scores on standard tracks lumped in to the "Other Records" section. Depending on the reception from others in the community on this change, it might make more sense to add a line to the record count section - first line is premium WRs, second is standard track WRs, third is all other scores...of course, finding the right titles for these section might be tricky (i.e. premium WR vs. standard WR sounds odd), but maybe that furthers the case that some top scores should just be considered "other" records.

    Guess we'll see how this goes.
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Join us