thread

Dispute: Duc Dang - Nintendo DS - 101-in-1 Explosive Megamix - Sniper / Sharpshooter [Points] - Player: Andrew Peter Peter Mee - Score: 12,200

User Tag List

Is this a valid dispute?

This poll is closed
    This poll is closed
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 41 to 43 of 43
  1. VERIFIED Senior Member Credibility: 4,135
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    867
    Thanks (Received)
    951
    Likes (Received)
    1024
    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    10 Thread(s)
    Follows
    21
    Following
    14
    Open and shut case here - voting yes...check those numbers closely folks!
    Thanks HugDD thanked this post
    Likes HugDD liked this post
  2. VERIFIED Veteran Member Credibility: 35,000
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,885
    Thanks (Received)
    1984
    Likes (Received)
    2280
    Live Streaming Channel(s)
    View Channel: stella_blue
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Follows
    29
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonV91 View Post
    Open and shut case here

    Yes, it certainly is, or at least it should be.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Hawksett View Post
    Ok we can go for the super-cool-awesome route here.

    By the time a decision point was reached, the score had been surpassed and the issue fixed. This one is being rejected.

    Thanks for all the input here. The other track issues brought up here will be dealt with separately.

    Hey Dave,

    Your reply was posted just over a month ago, yet no discernible administrative action has been taken. The original submission (with an incorrect score) remains in the Accepted archive. It has NOT been transferred to the Rejected archive, where it clearly belongs.

    Is there some issue, real or imagined, that has kept this dispute open for 49 days?

    Please elaborate on your most recent statements.

    What's the deal?

    Thanks HugDD thanked this post
    Likes HugDD liked this post
  3. VERIFIED COMMISSIONER Credibility: 8,000
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Leigh-On-Sea, UK
    Posts
    225
    Thanks (Received)
    247
    Likes (Received)
    427
    Blog Entries
    10
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Follows
    17
    Following
    6
    This one has taken a while as I explored all the alternatives. We rejected this dispute initially because the score was no longer visible once enough votes had accrued. The alternatives I looked at included ways of not having a CR hit on this one. We have now discussed this internally and yesterday came to a conclusion.

    Preventing any CR loss by keeping this open has the effect of punishing those who voted no on the score submission. This is unfair on those members so we are finally removing this score. We cannot manually adjust CR.

    That it has been overwritten already is not enough to prevent this as the overwritten score is still on our database, even though it is invisible. If we allow the scoreboards to display a player’s older surpassed scores, for historical context, this score would be visible again.

    Typos made decades ago are one issue the dispute system is gradually solving. Typos made in modern submissions, which are not spotted by adjudicators, will lead to problems in the future.

    Thanks for everyone’s patience while I looked at alternatives, but we have agreed internally to remove the score based on my reasoning above and all of the discussion preceding it.
    Thanks HugDD, stella_blue thanked this post
    Likes sdwyer138, HugDD liked this post
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Join us