Seaquest

Platform :

Image Provided by: TWIN GALAXIES

Tags
Expert skill Index
1

GregDeg

42.42

2 David B Yancey 39.88
3 Ulisses Patriota 34.09
4 Patrick Stanley 30.42
5 Snowflake 26.28
6 Ken Vance 23.13
7 RTM 21.81
8 Keith Post 20.49
9 Matt Reed 19.03
10 Joseph Knasin 17.24

Performances

Submit Performance
NTSC - Game 1, Difficulty B (Points)
FOUNDED BY: TWIN GALAXIES
Search Per Page
  • Rank

    1

    David Yancey
    Date Submitted: 2002-05-01
    Percent: 100.00%
    ESI: 39.88
    Verification Method: Video
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    999,999

  • Rank

    2

    Patrick Stanley
    Date Submitted: 2019-10-18
    Percent: 52.13%
    ESI: 30.42
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    521,330

  • Rank

    3

    GregDeg
    Date Submitted: 2022-04-08
    Percent: 49.40%
    ESI: 28.61
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    493,950

  • Rank

    4

    Snowflake
    Date Submitted: 2020-10-08
    Percent: 42.82%
    ESI: 26.28
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    428,180

  • Rank

    5

    Ulisses Patriota
    Date Submitted: 2021-01-17
    Percent: 41.59%
    ESI: 24.8
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    415,920

  • Rank

    6

    Ken Vance
    Date Submitted: 1983-09-01
    Percent: 38.80%
    ESI: 23.13
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    388,000

  • Rank

    7

    RTM
    Date Submitted: 2000-07-05
    Percent: 38.55%
    ESI: 21.81
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    385,490

  • Rank

    8

    Keith Post
    Date Submitted: 2003-07-15
    Percent: 38.22%
    ESI: 20.49
    Verification Method: Video
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    382,200

  • Rank

    9

    Matt Reed
    Date Submitted: 2002-12-20
    Percent: 36.58%
    ESI: 19.03
    Verification Method: Video
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    365,790

  • Rank

    10

    Joseph Knasin
    Date Submitted: 2004-06-11
    Percent: 31.57%
    ESI: 17.24
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    315,690

  • Rank

    11

    redelf
    Date Submitted: 2018-05-02
    Percent: 31.15%
    ESI: 15.97
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    311,490

  • Rank

    12

    James Randall
    Date Submitted: 2009-07-23
    Percent: 26.72%
    ESI: 14.35
    Verification Method: Video
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    267,220

  • Rank

    13

    Garrett Holland
    Date Submitted: 2019-05-19
    Percent: 23.39%
    ESI: 12.89
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    233,850

  • Rank

    14

    CONSOLEPLAYEROFTHECENTURY
    Date Submitted: 2005-09-03
    Percent: 21.98%
    ESI: 11.61
    Verification Method: Video
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    219,760

  • Rank

    15

    Troy Whelan
    Date Submitted: 2003-08-22
    Percent: 21.41%
    ESI: 10.41
    Verification Method: Video
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    214,090

  • Rank

    16

    Michael Ryan
    Date Submitted: 2004-06-11
    Percent: 20.61%
    ESI: 9.21
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    206,050

  • Rank

    17

    Mark Rupprecht
    Date Submitted: 2004-06-11
    Percent: 18.88%
    ESI: 7.97
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    188,790

  • Rank

    18

    Chris Foote
    Date Submitted: 2016-01-03
    Percent: 17.21%
    ESI: 6.76
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    172,130

  • Rank

    19

    James Carter
    Date Submitted: 2004-06-11
    Percent: 16.39%
    ESI: 5.6
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    163,850

  • Rank

    20

    Greg Easterly
    Date Submitted: 2004-06-11
    Percent: 14.33%
    ESI: 4.42
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    143,250

  • Rank

    21

    starsoldier1
    Date Submitted: 2022-06-01
    Percent: 13.15%
    ESI: 3.29
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    131,480

  • Rank

    22

    Pat Larocque
    Date Submitted: 2020-03-09
    Percent: 10.43%
    ESI: 2.15
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    104,280

  • Rank

    23

    Roger Edwin Blair 111
    Date Submitted: 2019-10-16
    Percent: 5.11%
    ESI: 1.04
    Verification Method: TGSAP
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    51,070

  • Rank

    24

    Brien King
    Date Submitted: 2000-07-16
    Percent: 1.68%
    ESI: 0
    Verification Method: Referee
    Status: Undisputed
    Points

    16,820

Discussion
Marcade -
These rules of "leeching and hunting is OK" makes no sense whatsoever, as there is ALWAYS a timer built in the game on all the levels anyways, if not completed on time.
datagod -
Is the timer visible? I suppose I could just play a game and find out for myself. Oh look at the time.
Marcade -
Yes, it is a visible "oxygen bar" that starts full, then counts down to empty, thus causing you to lose a scuba diver.
Snowflake -

There are 2 ways to make "progress" in this game, other than of course increasing the score itself, which cannot be viewed as progress since otherwise all leeching could claim progress
1. increase difficulty by surfacing. as marcade correctly points out there is a timer where you MUST surface or lose a life
2. increase points multiplier by surfacing with a full sub. a player could choose not to progress in this fashion, but they would still have to progress in the fashion lined out in point 1. so even if progression in this fashion were avoided, progress would stil be made for the more important thing (difficulty) also refusing to increase the points multiplier can only harm the player doing so and would make no sense to do intentionally.

if i were to speculate, i could see someone being aware of the second type of progression halt and incorrectly conclude that would halt difficulty progress as well.

TL;DR: marcade is correct, leeching is impossible so the rule allowing it is harmless but is also unneeded and silly



You need to be logged in to post a comment.
Close Popup

Type User name
  • Add
  • Cancel
Join us