Seaquest
Image Provided by: TWIN GALAXIES
Atari 2600 / VCS
| 1 |
Greg Degeneffe2,035.00 |
|
| 2 | Garrett C. Holland | 1,409.00 |
| 3 | Roger Edwin Blair 111 | 1,223.00 |
| 4 | Steve Germershausen | 1,134.00 |
| 5 | glen sampson | 1,052.00 |
| 6 | william rosa | 923.00 |
| 7 | Peter Nadalin | 897.00 |
| 8 | Robert T Mruczek | 890.00 |
| 9 | John P McAllister | 837.00 |
| 10 | David B Yancey | 687.00 |
| 1 |
David B Yancey38.11 |
|
| 2 | Patrick Stanley | 29.02 |
| 3 | william rosa | 26.27 |
| 4 | Ulisses José Patriota de Lima | 25.99 |
| 5 | Greg Degeneffe | 23.19 |
| 6 | Ken Vance | 21.83 |
| 7 | Robert T Mruczek | 20.52 |
| 8 | Keith Post | 19.20 |
| 9 | Matt Reed | 17.75 |
| 10 | Joseph Knasin | 16.01 |
Performances
Submit Performance-
Rank
1
David B Yancey
Date Submitted: 2002-05-01Percent: 100.00%Verification Method: VideoStatus: UndisputedPoints 999,999
-
Rank
2
Patrick Stanley
Date Submitted: 2019-10-18Percent: 52.13%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
3
william rosa
Date Submitted: 2020-10-08Percent: 42.82%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
4
Ulisses José Patriota de Lima
Date Submitted: 2021-01-17Percent: 41.59%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
5
Greg Degeneffe
Date Submitted: 2019-10-07Percent: 39.39%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
6
Ken Vance
Date Submitted: 1983-09-01Percent: 38.80%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 388,000
-
Rank
7
Robert T Mruczek
Date Submitted: 2000-07-05Percent: 38.55%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 385,490
-
Rank
8
Points 382,200
-
Rank
9
Points 365,790
-
Rank
10
Joseph Knasin
Date Submitted: 2004-06-11Percent: 31.57%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 315,690
-
Rank
11
John P McAllister
Date Submitted: 2018-05-02Percent: 31.15%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
12
James Randall
Date Submitted: 2009-07-23Percent: 26.72%Verification Method: VideoStatus: UndisputedPoints 267,220
-
Rank
13
Garrett C. Holland
Date Submitted: 2019-05-19Percent: 23.39%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
14
Rudy J. Ferretti
Date Submitted: 2005-09-03Percent: 21.98%Verification Method: VideoStatus: UndisputedPoints 219,760
-
Rank
15
Troy Whelan
Date Submitted: 2003-08-22Percent: 21.41%Verification Method: VideoStatus: UndisputedPoints 214,090
-
Rank
16
Michael Ryan
Date Submitted: 2004-06-11Percent: 20.61%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 206,050
-
Rank
17
Mark Rupprecht
Date Submitted: 2004-06-11Percent: 18.88%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 188,790
-
Rank
18
Chris Foote
Date Submitted: 2016-01-03Percent: 17.21%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
19
James Carter
Date Submitted: 2004-06-11Percent: 16.39%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 163,850
-
Rank
20
Greg Easterly
Date Submitted: 2004-06-11Percent: 14.33%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 143,250
-
Rank
21
Patrick Larocque
Date Submitted: 2020-03-09Percent: 10.43%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
22
Roger Edwin Blair 111
Date Submitted: 2019-10-16Percent: 5.11%Verification Method: TGSAPStatus: Undisputed -
Rank
23
Brien King
Date Submitted: 2000-07-16Percent: 1.68%Verification Method: RefereeStatus: UndisputedPoints 16,820
-
Share
Share
There are 2 ways to make "progress" in this game, other than of course increasing the score itself, which cannot be viewed as progress since otherwise all leeching could claim progress
1. increase difficulty by surfacing. as marcade correctly points out there is a timer where you MUST surface or lose a life
2. increase points multiplier by surfacing with a full sub. a player could choose not to progress in this fashion, but they would still have to progress in the fashion lined out in point 1. so even if progression in this fashion were avoided, progress would stil be made for the more important thing (difficulty) also refusing to increase the points multiplier can only harm the player doing so and would make no sense to do intentionally.
if i were to speculate, i could see someone being aware of the second type of progression halt and incorrectly conclude that would halt difficulty progress as well.
TL;DR: marcade is correct, leeching is impossible so the rule allowing it is harmless but is also unneeded and silly
