MyOwnWorstEnemy's Feed
The Curse of daddydick strikes again - Credibility
Well I guess its my turn to post about a credibility hit I took in the last 24 hours. The best that I can tell is that its a result of a submission that I adjudicated over 2 years ago. While I'll stick to my belief that the underlying reasons for the issues with this submission are due to failures in performing custodial responsibilities, taking the fall for others failures is part of life. The real tragedy is that nothing has changed in the adjudication process to prevent the adjudication to close right after new, material information is learned. How's that saying go... "history is doomed to repeat itself if it not learned".
Here's the link for folks interested in what caused this and probably 10 other like submission disputes from the same guy, Mr Daddydick. There were some good ideas discussed in the debate and some solutions on how to make the adjudication process better. https://www.twingalaxies.com/showthread.php/179695-Dispute-Simon-Leitch-PlayStation-2-Need-for-Speed-Underground-NTSC-Circuit-Mode-Inner-City-Fastest-Lap-Player-ruven-zambrano-Score-47-08/page16?highlight=Need+for+Speed
@admin staff , @Jace Hall
I have a few concerns on this credibility hit. If you could kindly respond back with answers and clarification.
1) The submission was accepted and than disputed due to video no longer available (YouTube). This valid dispute was affirmed by the acting Head Custodian in December 2017. However, the recent post indicates that this was cancelled by the submitter on 4/27/2020????
2) The penalty for an incorrect vote is 5% of credibility at the time the vote was cast. My credibility rating was somewhere between 14,000 and 16,000 (from what I remember) at the end of 2017. I would expect a 700 to 800 drop. Unfortunately, the credibility hit that I took was based on yesterday's credibility of 20891 (5% = 1,045). My credibility dropped to 19,865 - approximately 1,045 (difference likely due to a few submission that I voted on and received 3 credibility. See below
3) How many of more of these 'blasts from the pasts' credibility hits from daddydick should I expected to see in the future? Is this it? Should there be a 'statue of limitations' on how long an accepted disputes sits in your queue and is not acted upon? At some point, administration needs to take some responsibility for shortfalls in processes they design and execute.