Ah I forgot about the credibility requirement. My mistake.
Cool you think that the rules don't apply to you and you make poor choices in voting.
Ah I forgot about the credibility requirement. My mistake.
Cool you think that the rules don't apply to you and you make poor choices in voting.
Well I didn't know that the rule even existed, if you see other people doing the same thing and having their scores accepted you'll think it's acceptable. So I don't think I am to blame for the account issue. When it comes to credibility I trusted the judgement of og members knowing how to submit an correct submission although I guess that's not the case with some. It was my fault, but I also don't have the amount of time as most to watch through 30minutes of evidence for every submission I vote on. Appreciate your concern
if others are dong the same thats a problem. You can absolutley speak up. There was an atari guy that did it, wasnt tranparent, and was doing so to have double thevotees to approve his stuf faster, pretty sure he got banned. admin seems pretty understaning of honest mistakes, the bans tend to be for the people who arent transparent about it, but even honest mistakes, if you know of others, the sooner its brought to light the better.
oh and if you didnt know, the reward for a correct vote is 3 point, but the punishment for a wrong one is 5% current cred, so the penalty is lighter at lower cred and harsher at higher cred. your credi s how many votes you get, so if people want high cred its makes sense penalty is a percentage and grows cause well if you want more voting power you need to earn it not just with more voting but with a much higher perventage of correct votes.
for stabilziing at 1000 cred, thats 50 cred hit per mistake, 3 points per correct, so you can be wrong 1 out 18 times on avg and still maintain the right to submit
Confusing how high up on your horse you can be cowboy. I've already voted no on my submission, the matters already been talked about and I've now been told the information I was needed, so I am not sure why you're trying to boast about having a high cred.
I believe I lost over 50 credibility at one point because I voted "incorrectly". Mind you the vote eventually was overturned via dispute and instead of having my credibility reinstated, I got a fat nothing to show for it. Even though in the end, my vote was correct.
I bear a grudge against the so called credibility score this site has. There should not be a penalty for voting "incorrectly" especially one so harsh that a new member voting wrong is then barred from making submissions. guiness tried to part ways with my version of twin galaxies because they stated publicly the submissions should be free. Nevermind their hypocrisy as they wanted to charge me $2k for a convention appearance to witness a record. So much for records being free, right?
That said, I cannot fathom why there is a credibility requirement at all for submitting a score. If they submit an invalid score with low credibility, there should be a sanction in place to prevent them from submitting again. Perhaps a week, a month, and eventually permanently barred from submissions.
I'm doing the same as Luigi