What Chris said about how the position of TG changed radically depending on the changing hands of ownership...this is not unlike real-life politics where one administration's make-up of the Supremes leans towards supporting key cases like "Roe-v-Wade" while another administration's session make-up leans towards a reversal.
Some decisions and policies, once established, cannot "flip-flop" depending on who is in charge, else you can imagine how chaotic things would be in major sports like baseball, football, basketball and soccer if the replay rules changed every time a new Chairperson/Top-Official was in charge.
Or worse, imagine in baseball if a new Commissioner decided to reverse the Pete Rose ruling after decades, and then once that commissioner retires the next one re-instates the ban again.
Some policies, once established, CANNOT be changed unless there was a truly flawed decision-making process when said policy was originally drafted.