* for a rejection of the original claim, rather.
I'm just here so I don't get fined.
I thought about this more, and Im voting NO to this dispute. After reading the ruleset and the global rules, all of the rules were satisfied for this submission to be accepted. The dispute was filed due to the back of the game not being shown, when it turns out it was clearly shown within the comments, which is and has always been an acceptable form of evidence submission, proven by hundreds, if not thousands of other submissions being accepted based on that standard. This dispute is not valid.