I'm curious to see how the dispute would go since some now take it as leeching but I don't like how long they go on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowflake
as you word it i agree (btw i disputed it the moment i made the comment) however i dont think that wording applies here. this isnt really a "test case" when you have actual rationale that was laid out for it to be leeching. all the evidence shows its leeching, even more so in kevins case than here as he manages to do it for far long, the only counter evidence is both players belief -- note im not calling them wrong, they may well be right i'm not an expert on the game. but i think when ruling if somehting is leeching we need something more than the word of the player telling us to trust them that its not. also disputing for an official answer has been done before. evn disputed rudy's splatterhouse score due to the modification, and as a result got the modification ruled acceptable.
I know people feel a disputed score hurts the player, i disagree, any score still disputed is still on the scoreboard and thefore is just as valid as any undisputed score however ,since theres room for opinion on this i can definitley agree to disagree and not really argue the point. i understand many share your viewpoint, but i feel differently. I did notice theres a "inactive dispute" area with no disputes in it, it seems tg is working towards a solution on this matter that may keep all sides happy that isnt complete yet.
