redelf's Feed
Fixing the adjudication que.
Wondering if a solution to the big submission que is to give more voting power to those that are active or in the top 50 or something. Make their votes 4-8 times worth the voting power, these people do a lot of work and if you haven't figured it out already people are loosing interest in how it isn't working to peoples expectations. People are leaving because this issue isn't being addressed. It shouldn't take weeks or months for a submission to go through.
If you have 100 submissions from 1 player all on the same game/platform allow them to pass within days. Create a check list that someone can check off, like time correct, score correct, bootup shown, everything checks out. Let that checklist show that such and such person did it and then others if they trust that individual just push accept and move on. We don't need 10 or 20 people watching the same performance over and over again to make sure it's up to specs, that should really only be done for a mature score (popular and heavily contested games) and if it's a record. For a track with 50 scores a 35th place score shouldn't be scrutinized as heavily as a top 5 score.
Please do something to fix this ongoing problem of losing people from the community do to outdated procedures. The community has matured and the adjudication system needs maturation also.