wolfmame was not used here :(

No Wolfmame. Not valid unfortunately.

Originally Posted by lexmark

This track might be better off played the same as the ZK coconut challenge track. That being that more than one attempt be allowed on the same INP. It's a PITA to adjust the settings every attempt. That would solve the nvram problem too.

There was precedent on previous submissions on this track that was agreeable by most adjudicators (save one person if I recall). Given that changing settings was more time consuming than actually playing the game, up to five submissions were accepted on one INP -for this particular track- so long as the the submitted game was clearly noted.

The concept of one game per INP is very logical normally speaking as it's almost always difficult or confusing for adjudicators to wade through multiple submissions. Doing so on this track makes it essentially unplayable.

With the above said, it's also essentially a throw away track. While very fun to play and it most certainly requires skill, imo anyway it's more of a novelty than anything else.

Originally Posted by jpittman

That is correct, and WolfMAME 0.169 was used.

I'm assuming this must be true since I could play back the INP file using WolfMAME 0.169. It is possible to replay a non-WolfMAME submission using WolfMAME? If so, then I could be wrong here.

Originally Posted by jpittman

I'm assuming this must be true since I could play back the INP file using WolfMAME 0.169. It is possible to replay a non-WolfMAME submission using WolfMAME? If so, then I could be wrong here.

Yes it is possible. Wolfmame was not used. It says in the analysis with version was used

Or should say MAME 0.169/W

Originally Posted by CWK

notice it says recorded with MAME 0.169
it should say recorded with MAME[W] 0.169

If you'll re-read my last post, you'll see that my point was that WolfMAME 0.169 is NOT including the "W" for some reason. I recorded my own test game in WolfMAME and the "W" was also missing.