Originally Posted by thubbie

My complete performance was recorded. All 22 kills in non stop motioned recorded action that displayed no cheats. On top of that the data matched point for point with the leaderboards. The only thing that was not recorded was the next slide after the win credit screen with the number 22. It is completely obvious and there is no foul play in any of my killings. How is this submission still in question of legitness?

The amount of trouble to gather more points in itself to submit another post is a deterrent for people like me. This community won't grow with stagnant and outdated processes. Use technology for crying out loud to help the verification process. If the h1z1 player community itself sees how obvious this case is, maybe this community that doesn't specialize in this game should take some notes because you all are losing credibility by the second. Go to the Reddit.com/r/kotk for an example of what they think of your current decisions right now...

Your complete performance was not recorded according to the specified rules that you have had access to from the beginning.

All of your H1Z1 competitive peers on the leaderboard have provided complete submissions according to the rules. You are suggesting that you should be treated differently from them in your submission review.

If the H1Z1 community sees how obvious this case is as you indicate, then there should be no problem in getting this submission through the system as they are the ones voting on its legitimacy. You are being reviewed by your peers for certain. Twin Galaxies itself does not participate in the adjudication voting process at all. As many have learned, the comments on an adjudication in no way dictate or display the guaranteed direction or number of people voting on a submission. So hopefully you have made your case and the adjudicating H1Z1 community agrees with your assessment.

Originally Posted by thubbie

When and where do I see the current standing of this submission? And as a staff member can you at least credit back my submission points to just move on peacefully? This clearly is a misunderstanding, and your point on the community gets to vote, you are also accepting trolls and non experience gamers of the genre to make decisions in the mix. At least have a team of established players in that specific game to judge especially when a lot is on the line like... 300k?

This is the current submission thread. You can go to the first page of it to alter your vote. There is no information ever provided to anyone on the standing of any adjudication vote in process. This is to prevent manipulation and collusion. No one ever is allowed to know anything specific about the voting, other than their own personal vote of course.

Unfortunately, you can not be credited back submission points. The system itself prevents that. Everything across the entire system is balanced and the result of user activity. Submission points can not be created out of thin air, they have to be generated by the system itself through activity.

In regard to voter experience, the system is weighted by user. This means that not all votes are equal. Authority and voting weight is earned over time. Users with higher credibility have more voting power than users with less credibility. A user who has adjudicated several thousand video game performances of all types is very experienced in examining clear rule sets and determining if a submitted performance is following them. In regard to H1Z1 performances specifically, there are now hundreds of verified pro-level players from that community specifically adjudicating H1Z1 performances. In fact it is likely that nowhere else on the internet are more people specifically looking at H1Z1 performances for the specific purposes of verification and authentication.

Please understand that there are many H1Z1 players that want to compete in the upcoming tournament and they are dead serious about screening all incoming participants for possible cheating. As you know, H1Z1 suffers extensively from players who use cheats, and none of the players who are competing for a $300K prize pool want anyone in the mix that does not deserve to be there. Many of the players who will be competing are absolutely looking at each others performances for numerous reasons, as well are the team orgs. Any cheating or manipulation found in performances now or later will disqualify that player and also an entire team from the competition (if they already played in the tournament.) Everything is quite serious here and is focused on establishing professional level standards. That means there can be no special treatment of anyone for any reason.

The individual people you are speaking with in this adjudication thread are NOT Twin Galaxies moderators as you have falsely indicated in the Reddit thread. They are just members like yourself voicing their opinion on your submission, nothing more.

Twin Galaxies itself, can not vote on any submission, and does not dictate how others must vote. Every adjudicating member votes according to their own determination regarding their understanding of the specified rules and the submission performance they are reviewing. All records are kept public and are permanent for future reference.

The Twin Galaxies leaderboards are being used to qualify all participants in the tournament. It is completely fair and objective and open to anyone who wants to apply. There are no politics, no exceptions, and no favoritism. Once a player qualifies on the leaderboard, they become eligible to play in the tournament on any team that wants them.

Oh come on now. You're very clearly telling the community how to vote here. At least own it. And yes I know it's not explicit but really this is going further than I've ever seen in a submission before.

You're stating:

1. That the full recording rule has no exceptions (as stated in the rules) and give reasons for it.
2. That this submission is not a full recording.

Doesn't take a lot of critical thinking to extrapolate that you're saying the submission violates the rules. When that happens people vote reject.

Whatever you're doing here don't pretend to be not influencing the vote.

Originally Posted by ssdninja

Oh come on now. You're very clearly telling the community how to vote here. At least own it. And yes I know it's not explicit but really this is going further than I've ever seen in a submission before.

You're stating:

1. That the full recording rule has no exceptions (as stated in the rules) and give reasons for it.
2. That this submission is not a full recording.

Doesn't take a lot of critical thinking to extrapolate that you're saying the submission violates the rules. When that happens people vote reject.

Whatever you're doing here don't pretend to be not influencing the vote.

You're absolutely correct ninja