beat me to it

extra annoying as what caused this to be accepted was a reject

i get theres essentially a quorum, but the principle behind a quorum makes no sense in these cases. sure, demanding a minimum number of adjudicators discuss among themselves makes perfect sense. but demanding a certain among number of votes? how the heck does the final "no" vote with zero discussion somehow make the other "yes" votes any more valid?

this isnt the first time this has happened. if the quorum principle absolutley must stay at least consider then adding some time to a sub after each vote so that there actually can be discussion based on the new persons input.

The settings just before gameplay:



The rule: Options must be set to Credit Limit = 1. The player's setting: Credit Limit = 4
The rule: Pause = Disabled. The player's setting: Pause = Enabled.

inb4: The track rules do not state: "The settings must be Credit Limit = 4, unless you just don't use the other three, then you can have on whatever setting you want." The track rules also do not state: "the settings must be Pause = Disabled, unless you just don't pause the game, then you can have it whatever setting you want."

Originally Posted by Snowflake

how the heck does the final "no" vote with zero discussion somehow make the other "yes" votes any more valid?

It appears even worse than that ... I would bet the last 3 votes were no votes, at the very least.

Even if he didn't pause or continue, rules are still rules.

I watched the startup on the original submission, he used the USA rom but I'm not sure he used a NTSC console, evrdrives will let you run NTSC and PAL games on either but you need to be on the correct formatted console for a TG sub. It's a model 2 console so i'm not familar enough to know