Shouldn't the submission be rejected the second one of the 4 participants said "no I didn't participate in this"? Why bother waiting for all 4 when it should really just be 1 to reject it.

Originally Posted by voltronforce0

Shouldn't the submission be rejected the second one of the 4 participants said "no I didn't participate in this"? Why bother waiting for all 4 when it should really just be 1 to reject it.

Because the one remaining person isn't bothering to vote.

@JJT_Defender you're clearly hear, you're even liking my stuff. If for some reason you're unable to vote or comment then contact admin staff. Theres more to life than TG, noone has to vote on anything, but this is starting to feel like some game you're playing

Can we get an @admin in here?

I voted No.
Done!

Originally Posted by Snowflake

@JJT_Defender you're clearly hear, you're even liking my stuff. If for some reason you're unable to vote or comment then contact admin staff. Theres more to life than TG, noone has to vote on anything, but this is starting to feel like some game you're playing

Originally Posted by Aozaki

Hi all.

can you republish this topic or do you have to wait for it to be resolved before you can do it again.

Thank you

Jorge, did you vote no? You don't directly say you have, whereas the other participants say they all have, but the submission is still here.

You say you voted, but it still says it's under voting by participants. Are you really telling us the truth?

Jorge Gutierrez needs to vote no.

Originally Posted by Lauren Tyler

You say you voted, but it still says it's under voting by participants. Are you really telling us the truth?