as much as i love this game i did not play hahahahahahaa

The funny part is I never even got a notification that I was added to the games player list??? I thought the system was set up to do so.

@JJT_Defender this seems to just need you to vote no to move out of the queue

Man it’s wild that “participants” don’t get notified.

Do we need admin perhaps?

Originally Posted by Lauren Tyler

Do we need admin perhaps?

this is dicey bc we know by common knowledge that the above-listed players did not participate. However a score claim was made based on multi players. The claim is wrong and should be rejected. But we can’t reject until all “participants” vote.

I’ll just wait for my chance to vote no I guess. Apparently Johnny Lightning is the “participant” we are waiting on.

Originally Posted by bensweeneyonbass

this is dicey bc we know by common knowledge that the above-listed players did not participate. However a score claim was made based on multi players. The claim is wrong and should be rejected. But we can’t reject until all “participants” vote.

I’ll just wait for my chance to vote no I guess. Apparently Johnny Lightning is the “participant” we are waiting on.

Is he even active?

This brings up a great use case. What if all the tagged participants are unable or unwilling to all vote the same way. Yes, it was likely not considered to ever occur, but yet here we are.

A critical part of testing is not only testing what you expect to occur, but testing what happens when something you don't expect to occur does occur.

A great solution to this would be having submissions simply expire after a predetermined period of time. 6 months? 1 year? This is something I have suggested on a couple different occasions in the past.

Originally Posted by Lauren Tyler

Is he even active?

active enough to see this submission and like it